The Times editorial board critiques the Supreme Court’s overuse of the emergency docket to deliver consequential decisions ...

For decades, the United States tolerated a level of illegal immigration that fostered a sense of lawlessness at the border ...

WASHINGTON (AP) — A 2018 Supreme Court decision opened the floodgates to legalized sports-betting industry, now worth ...

The president has frequently spoken about the potentially drastic consequences if the Supreme Court strikes down his sweeping ...

Limited government requires not only laws but also the ambition of the political branches to check each other.

UC on Thursday asked the California Supreme Court to block the release of a UCLA settlement proposal sent by the Trump ...

In a 30-page amicus brief, the coalition argues that the 14th Amendment’s Citizenship Clause — which states that “all persons ...

During the hearing of the stray dog matter today, the Supreme Court expressed concerns over the recurring incidents of stray ...

But the case is now before a Supreme Court dominated by six Republican justices who rarely part ways with the leader of their ...

It is key to the longtime objectives supported by and benefiting the billionaires who funded the court-capture machine.

Yes, even when they are also regulations. Whether the Court agrees could determine the future of presidential power.