News
How Trump’s AI Plan Would Cut Regulation and Speed Up Adoption
In general, the action plan is much more focused on removing barriers to AI innovation than safeguarding individuals from AI-caused harm. The word “safety” only appears once in the plan. That’s in sharp contrast to Biden’s AI executive order, in which the word “safety” appeared 25 times.
Despite the Senate’s July 1 vote to protect states’ rights to keep residents safe, a moratorium is expected to once again ...
The Trump administration on Wednesday unveiled its AI action plan, a package of initiatives and policy recommendations meant to cement the United States as a global leader in a technology that’s ...
A federal proposal that would ban states and local governments from regulating AI for 10 years could soon be signed into law, ...
AI regulation is critical, but it can easily do much more harm than good. This is why it’s important for there to be a thoughtful approach that focuses on finding the right balance between ...
Many policy discussions on AI safety regulation have focused on the need to establish regulatory "guardrails" to protect the public from the risks of AI technology. In a new paper published in ...
AI companies say they’re actually looking forward to government regulation in the form of a new safety consortium Many are already doing work similar to what NIST is intended to accomplish, ...
OpenAI signs the EU AI Code while Meta rejects it revealing divergent strategies on regulation, market expansion, and the ...
AI crucially depends on large volumes of high-quality data. Model accuracy and outcomes directly reflect the data it was trained on. Hence, data regulation is central to AI regulation. AI ...
Artificial intelligence (AI) in health care is rapidly advancing beyond traditional applications. Autonomous AI agents are ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results
Feedback